{
  "id": "nexus-ext-1-0005-368675",
  "citation": "",
  "section": "nexus_decisions",
  "doc_type": "court_decision",
  "title_es": "No procede el incentivo por riesgo policial a guardaparques",
  "title_en": "Police risk incentive does not apply to park rangers",
  "summary_es": "El fallo de segunda instancia confirma que los guardaparques no tienen derecho al incentivo por riesgo policial, ya que sus funciones, si bien colaboran con autoridades judiciales y policiales, no conllevan el nivel de riesgo directo y continuo propio de los cuerpos policiales. Se declara sin lugar el recurso del actor y se le exonera en costas por haber litigado de buena fe, manteniendo lo resuelto en primera instancia. Esta decisión clarifica los límites de los beneficios laborales del personal de conservación del SINAC en comparación con las fuerzas policiales, subrayando que la exposición situacional al riesgo en labores de protección ambiental no se equipara al riesgo estructural de la función policial.",
  "summary_en": "The appellate ruling confirms that park rangers are not entitled to the police risk incentive, as their duties, while collaborative with judicial and police authorities, do not entail the same level of direct and continuous risk characteristic of police forces. The plaintiff's appeal is denied and costs are waived due to good faith litigation, upholding the first-instance decision. This ruling clarifies the limits of SINAC conservation staff's labor benefits vis-à-vis police forces, emphasizing that situational risk exposure in environmental protection does not equate to the structural risk of police work.",
  "court_or_agency": "",
  "date": "",
  "year": "",
  "topic_ids": [
    "_off-topic"
  ],
  "primary_topic_id": "_off-topic",
  "es_concept_hints": [
    "guardaparques",
    "incentivo por riesgo policial",
    "buena fe",
    "exoneración en costas",
    "SINAC"
  ],
  "concept_anchors": [],
  "keywords_es": [
    "guardaparques",
    "incentivo por riesgo policial",
    "SINAC",
    "riesgo laboral",
    "buena fe",
    "exoneración en costas"
  ],
  "keywords_en": [
    "park rangers",
    "police risk incentive",
    "SINAC",
    "workplace risk",
    "good faith",
    "cost exemption"
  ],
  "excerpt_es": "Por tanto, se confirma lo resuelto en primera instancia, declarando sin lugar el recurso del actor. EXONERACIÓN EN COSTAS. BUENA FE.",
  "excerpt_en": "Therefore, the first-instance resolution is confirmed, declaring the plaintiff's appeal without merit. EXONERATION OF COSTS. GOOD FAITH.",
  "outcome": {
    "label_en": "Denied",
    "label_es": "Sin lugar",
    "summary_en": "The appellate court confirms the denial of the police risk incentive to a park ranger, as his duties do not equate to the structural risk of police forces, and costs are waived for good faith.",
    "summary_es": "Se confirma en segunda instancia la denegatoria del incentivo por riesgo policial a un guardaparques, al no equipararse sus funciones con el riesgo estructural de los cuerpos policiales, y se le exonera en costas por buena fe."
  },
  "pull_quotes": [
    {
      "context": "Encabezado del fallo",
      "quote_en": "THE RECOGNITION OF THE POLICE RISK INCENTIVE FOR PARK RANGERS DOES NOT PROCEED.",
      "quote_es": "NO PROCEDE EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL INCENTIVO POR RIESGO POLICIAL A GUARDAPARQUES."
    },
    {
      "context": "Considerando",
      "quote_en": "The functions performed by park rangers are collaborative with judicial and police authorities, without involving the level of direct and continuous risk that characterizes police forces.",
      "quote_es": "Funciones desempeñadas por los guardaparques son de colaboración con autoridades judiciales y policiales, sin implicar el nivel de riesgo directo y continuo que caracteriza a los cuerpos policiales."
    },
    {
      "context": "Por tanto",
      "quote_en": "EXONERATION OF COSTS. GOOD FAITH.",
      "quote_es": "EXONERACIÓN EN COSTAS. BUENA FE."
    }
  ],
  "cites": [],
  "cited_by": [],
  "references": {
    "internal": [],
    "external": []
  },
  "source_url": "",
  "tier": 2,
  "_editorial_citation_count": 0,
  "regulations_by_article": null,
  "amendments_by_article": null,
  "dictamen_by_article": null,
  "concordancias_by_article": null,
  "afectaciones_by_article": null,
  "resoluciones_by_article": null,
  "cited_by_votos": [],
  "cited_norms": [],
  "cited_norms_inverted": [
    {
      "doc_id": "norm-12648",
      "norm_num": "7317",
      "norm_name": "Ley de Conservación de la Vida Silvestre",
      "tipo_norma": "Ley",
      "norm_fecha": "30/10/1992"
    },
    {
      "doc_id": "norm-41661",
      "norm_num": "7575",
      "norm_name": "Ley Forestal",
      "tipo_norma": "Ley",
      "norm_fecha": "13/02/1996"
    },
    {
      "doc_id": "norm-66525",
      "norm_num": "7410",
      "norm_name": "Ley General de Policía",
      "tipo_norma": "Ley",
      "norm_fecha": "26/05/1994"
    },
    {
      "doc_id": "norm-8216",
      "norm_num": "6084",
      "norm_name": "Ley del Servicio de Parques Nacionales",
      "tipo_norma": "Ley",
      "norm_fecha": "24/08/1977"
    }
  ],
  "sentencias_relacionadas": [],
  "temas_y_subtemas": [],
  "cascade_only": false,
  "amendment_count": 0,
  "body_es_text": "NO PROCEDE EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL INCENTIVO\nPOR RIESGO POLICIAL A\nGUARDAPARQUES. Funciones desempeñadas por los guardaparques\nson de colaboración con autoridades judiciales y policiales, sin\nimplicar el nivel de riesgo directo y continuo que caracteriza a los\ncuerpos policiales. Por tanto, se confirma lo resuelto en primera\ninstancia, declarando sin lugar el recurso del actor. EXONERACIÓN\nEN COSTAS. BUENA FE. [418-24]",
  "body_en_text": "INCENTIVE FOR POLICE RISK IS NOT RECOGNIZED FOR PARK RANGERS. The duties performed by the park rangers (guardaparques) involve collaboration with judicial and police authorities, without entailing the level of direct and continuous risk that characterizes police forces. Therefore, the ruling of the lower court is confirmed, dismissing the claimant's appeal. EXEMPTION FROM COSTS. GOOD FAITH. [418-24]"
}